U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1991

United States v. Robert S. Falcone, Sandra S. Falcone

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 12, 1991 · Tjoflat, Fay, Kravitch, Johnson, Hatchett, Anderson, Clark, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina

939 F.2d 1455; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 20216; 1991 WL 154272 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

G.H. Terando, Poplar Bluff, Mo., for R. Falcone., Kenneth M. Swartz, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Miami, Fla., for S. Falcone., Dawn Bowen, Linda C. Hertz, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, Fla., for U.S.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Denver H. Linville (11th Cir. 2000)
United States v. Neder (11th Cir. 1998)
United States v. Daniels (District Court, N.D. Texas 1998)
United States v. Andrew Menichino (11th Cir. 1993)
United States v. Roger Burnett (2d Cir. 1993)
United States v. Robert S. Falcone, Sandra S. Falcone (11th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Maria L. Sayan (D.C. Cir. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.