U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1991

Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 28, 1991 · Dubina, Henderson, Tjoflat

926 F.2d 1573; 1991 WL 32192 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

E. Freeman Leverett, Heard, Leverett, Adams and Phelps, P.C., Elberton, Ga., for plaintiffs-appellants., Carl R. Woodward, III, Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecehi & Stewart, Roseland, N.J. and Peter J. Anderson, Peterson, Dillard, Young Self & Asselin, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Vermeulen v. Renault U.S.A., Inc. (11th Cir. 1992)
Oliver M. Bond and Herta R. Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc. (11th Cir. 1991)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of the district court is affirmed on the basis of the district court’s dispositive opinion, which is reported as Bond v. Octagon Process, Inc., 745 F.Supp. 710 (M.D.Ga. 1990).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.