U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1991

United States v. Elgersma

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 24, 1991 · Anderson, Birch, Clark, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Johnson, Kravitch, Tjoflat

938 F.2d 179; 1991 WL 135484 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Joseph K. Ruddy, Patricia A. Kerwin, Asst. U.S. Attys., Tampa Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Charles L. Smith, Cross-Appellee (6th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Edwin Elgersma, United States of America v. Edwin Elgersma (11th Cir. 1992)
United States v. Edwin Elgersma (11th Cir. 1991)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

070rehearing

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 29, 1991, 11th Cir., 1991, 929 F.2d 1538)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.