U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1992

David E. Moore, an Individual v. Sun Bank of North Florida, N.A., a Florida Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 31, 1992 · Tjoflat, Fay, Hatchett, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina

953 F.2d 1274; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2219; 59 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 192; 1992 WL 15055 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Susan G. Sparks, Smith, Currie & Hancock, J. Thomas Kilpatrick, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant., Miriam R. Eisenstein, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae., S. Grier Wells, Brant, Moore, Sapp, MacDonald & Wells, P.A., W. Scott Cole, Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee., M. David Gelfand, Appellate Advocacy Program, Tulane Law School, Terry E. All-britton, New Orleans, La., for amicus curiae.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

David E. Moore, an Individual v. Sun Bank of North Florida, N.A., a Florida Corporation (11th Cir. 1992)
American Mining Congress v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (District Court, District of Columbia 1997)
Moore v. Sun Bank of North Florida, N.A. (11th Cir. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, HATCHETT, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges. * BY THE COURT:

A member of this court m active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.