U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1992

Lawrence Green v. Anthony Hill R.A. Sanders Robert E. Long Glenn Alred, Jr., and United States of America

Lawrence Green v. Anthony Hill R.A. Sanders Robert E. Long Glenn Alred, Jr., and United States of America
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 13, 1992 · Kravitch, Henderson, Clark
968 F.2d 1098; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 19404; 1992 WL 176605 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Lawrence Green v. Anthony Hill R.A. Sanders Robert E. Long Glenn Alred, Jr., and United States of America

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

On petition for rehearing, the government calls into question the remand portion of our opinion in its penultimate paragraph. See 954 F.2d 694. (11th Cir.) We withdraw the last full paragraph of the opinion and substitute the following:

We therefore remand the case for a determination by the district court of whether the alleged assault and battery was work related. If the district court finds that the assault and battery occurred within the scope of Hill’s employment, it must dismiss this case. If it finds that the acts occurred outside the *1099 scope of employment, it is within the district court’s discretion to continue its jurisdiction over the ease and adjudicate the controversy. On the other hand, the court may elect to remand the assault and battery issue to the state court. For an identical situation, see Nadler v. Mann, 951 F.2d 301, 306 n. 9 (11th Cir. 1992).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.