U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1992

United States v. George Rodgers

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 22, 1992 · Kravitch, Edmondson, Godbold

972 F.2d 1253; 1992 WL 212445 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

T. Jefferson Deen, III, Clark, Deen & Copeland, P.C., Mobile, Ala., for defendant-appellant., Charles A. Kandt, Richard H. Loftin, Asst. U.S. Attys., George A. Martin, Mobile, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Temmis (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 1999)
United States v. Francis Everett Foree and Christina Draznin (11th Cir. 1995)
United States v. David Wayne Holland, Cross-Appellee (11th Cir. 1994)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before KRAVITCH and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM:

The last paragraph of part A of our 28 January 1992 opinion is hereby withdrawn in its entirety. In its place we make this statement:

We see no reason to differ from the conclusion reached in other circuits on this question. The district court erred in assessing the three level increase.

The judgment of the Court and the remainder of the opinion are unchanged.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.