United States v. Ernest Marshall
Opinion
We find it proper to include the defendant when counting the individuals involved in the criminal activity. United States v. Schweihs, 971 F.2d 1302 (7th Cir. 1992); United States v. Harry, 960 F.2d *659 51, 53 (8th Cir. 1992); United States v. Fells, 920 F.2d 1179, 1182 (4th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2831, 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991); United States v. Reid, 911 F.2d 1456, 1464 (10th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S.- 111 S.Ct. 990, 112 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991); United States v. Barbontin, 907 F.2d 1494, 1498 (5th Cir. 1990); United States v. Preakos, 907 F.2d 7, 10 (1st Cir. 1990).
We find no merit in the other issues raised in this appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published