United States v. Ernest Marshall

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
United States v. Ernest Marshall, 976 F.2d 658 (11th Cir. 1992)
1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28368; 1992 WL 292530

United States v. Ernest Marshall

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We find it proper to include the defendant when counting the individuals involved in the criminal activity. United States v. Schweihs, 971 F.2d 1302 (7th Cir. 1992); United States v. Harry, 960 F.2d *659 51, 53 (8th Cir. 1992); United States v. Fells, 920 F.2d 1179, 1182 (4th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2831, 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991); United States v. Reid, 911 F.2d 1456, 1464 (10th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S.- 111 S.Ct. 990, 112 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991); United States v. Barbontin, 907 F.2d 1494, 1498 (5th Cir. 1990); United States v. Preakos, 907 F.2d 7, 10 (1st Cir. 1990).

We find no merit in the other issues raised in this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest MARSHALL, Defendant-Appellant
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published