United States v. Ernest Marshall
United States v. Ernest Marshall
976 F.2d 658; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28368; 1992 WL 292530
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
United States v. Ernest Marshall
Opinion
We find it proper to include the defendant when counting the individuals involved in the criminal activity. United States v. Schweihs, 971 F.2d 1302 (7th Cir. 1992); United States v. Harry, 960 F.2d *659 51, 53 (8th Cir. 1992); United States v. Fells, 920 F.2d 1179, 1182 (4th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2831, 115 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1991); United States v. Reid, 911 F.2d 1456, 1464 (10th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S.- 111 S.Ct. 990, 112 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1991); United States v. Barbontin, 907 F.2d 1494, 1498 (5th Cir. 1990); United States v. Preakos, 907 F.2d 7, 10 (1st Cir. 1990).
We find no merit in the other issues raised in this appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.