Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1992

United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee Bell

United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee Bell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided November 3, 1992 · Tjoflat, Fay, Kravitch, Hatchett, Anderson, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes
977 F.2d 1435; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29707; 1992 WL 316320 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Bennie Dean Herring, Billy Clyde Herring, Ronald Mills, and Dee Dee Bell

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑