Taffet v. Southern Co.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Taffet v. Southern Co., 958 F.2d 1514 (11th Cir. 1992)
1992 WL 70572

Taffet v. Southern Co.

Opinion of the Court

PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the applications for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Reference

Full Case Name
M.R. TAFFET and Robert M. Fierman, on Behalf of Themselves and all of the Persons, Corporations, Municipalities, and other Entities, other than the who are Similarly Situated v. The SOUTHERN CO., Southern Company Services, Inc., Alabama Power Company and Arthur Andersen & Co., Frederick Rodgers CARR, Carr Sales Company, O.E.M. Products, Inc., Timothy Dunn Stokely, III and all Others Similarly Situated v. The SOUTHERN COMPANY, Southern Company Services, Inc., Georgia Power Company, and Arthur Andersen & Co.
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published