U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1992

Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp. v. Donnelly Information Publishing, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided November 4, 1992 · Birch, Black, Carnes, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Tjoflat

977 F.2d 1435; 25 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1319; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29799 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Douglas C. Broeker, Michael J. Cappucio, Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot, Miami, Fla., David L. Foster, Theodore Case Whitehouse, Francis J. Men-ton, Jr., Willkie, Farr & Gallager, Baila H. Celedonia, Roger L. Zissu, Cowan, Liebow-itz & Latman, P.C., New York City, for appellants., Robert E. Richards, Anthony B. Askew, Jones, Askew & Lunsford, Atlanta, Ga., for BellSouth Advertising., John K. Roedel, Jr., Senniger, Powers, Leavitt & Roedel, St. Louis, Mo., for ami-cus ANADP., Robert E. Marsh, Blackwell, Sanders, Matheny, Weary & Lombardi, Kansas City, Mo., for amicus US West., Robert Alan Garrett, Arnold & Porter, Washington, D.C., for amicus Bell Atlantic.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Database America, Inc. v. Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corp. (District Court, D. New Jersey 1993)
Mastercraft Fabrics Corp. v. Dickson Elberton Mills Inc. (United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia 1993)
Bellsouth Advertising & Publishing Corporation v. Donnelley Information Publishing, Inc. (11th Cir. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, HATCHETT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.