U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1993

Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 7, 1993 · Anderson, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Kravitch, Tjoflat

993 F.2d 784; 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,643; 74 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 50; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14986 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Herbert P. Sehlanger, Atlanta, GA, for plaintiffs-appellants., MacFarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Claude H. Tison, Jr., Tampa, FL, for defendants-appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County (United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 1994)
The Cone Corporation v. Hillsborough County (11th Cir. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, and CARNES, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on plaintiffs-appellants’ suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court sitting en bane. The previous panel’s opinion 983 F.2d 197, is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.