Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit June 7, 1993

Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County, 993 F.2d 784 (11th Cir. 1993)

63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,643; 74 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 50; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 14986

Anderson, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Kravitch, Tjoflat

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, and CARNES, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on plaintiffs-appellants’ suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court sitting en bane. The previous panel’s opinion 983 F.2d 197, is hereby VACATED.

Reference

Full Case Name: The CONE CORPORATION J.W. Conner & Sons Bulger Contracting Co. Boyce Company S & E Contractors, Inc. Woodruff & Sons, Inc. Suncoast Utility Contractors Association, Cone Constructors, Inc. Dallas 1 Construction & Development, Inc. v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY Frederick B. Karl
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published