Mckinney v. Pate

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit June 17, 1993

Mckinney v. Pate, 994 F.2d 772 (11th Cir. 1993)

1993 WL 209679

Anderson, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Kravtich, Tjoflat

070rehearing

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVTICH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Millard McKINNEY v. John PATE, individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Osceola County Board of Commissioners, Jack Shannin, individually and in his official capacity as Development Dept. Director of Osceola County, and the Osceola County Board of Commissioners, Collectively
Cited By: 4 cases
Status: Published