U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1993

North Alabama Express v. Interstate Commerce Commission

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 30, 1993 · Edmondson, Gibson, Roney

996 F.2d 1072 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

George M. Boles, Weaver, Boles & El-more, Birmingham, AL, for Neely & North Alabama Exp., Robert C. Black, Montgomery, AL, for AAA Cooper., Suellen Powers Lambert, Alabama Public Service Com’n, Montgomery, AL, for Alabama Public Service Com’n-internor., Gerald D. Colvin, Jr., Bishop, Colvin, Johnson & Kent, Birmingham, AL, for Milan Exp., Inc., Sidney L. Strickland, Secretary, I.C.C., Michael Martin, U.S. Atty. Gen., Robert B. Nicholson, Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for I.C.C. & U.S.A., Robert L. Baker, Buck & Baker, Nashville, TN, for Averitt Exp., Inc., Kim D. Mann, Shawn, Berger & Mann, Washington, DC, for Deaton, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

North Alabama Express. v. Interstate Commerce Commission (11th Cir. 1993)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, RONEY * and GIBSON **, Senior Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The following sentence is withdrawn from our opinion in this case:

For instance, the ICC could not approve the transfer of intrastate routes in Alabama if the only other aspects of the transaction involved interstate routes between Oregon and California.

North Alabama Exp., Inc. v. I.C.C., 971 F.2d 661, 665 (11th Cir. 1992). Otherwise, the petitions for rehearing filed by respondent Interstate Commerce Commission and intervening respondent Ayeritt Express, Inc. are denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.