North Alabama Express v. Interstate Commerce Commission
North Alabama Express v. Interstate Commerce Commission
996 F.2d 1072
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
North Alabama Express v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
The following sentence is withdrawn from our opinion in this case:
For instance, the ICC could not approve the transfer of intrastate routes in Alabama if the only other aspects of the transaction involved interstate routes between Oregon and California.
North Alabama Exp., Inc. v. I.C.C., 971 F.2d 661, 665 (11th Cir. 1992). Otherwise, the petitions for rehearing filed by respondent Interstate Commerce Commission and intervening respondent Ayeritt Express, Inc. are denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.