United States v. "Lnu" Omar AKA Fernandez Omar
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision. The 8 that cite it most often are listed here.
- United States v. Ketut Pujayasa (11th Cir. 2017)
- United States v. Luis Eduardo Montenegro Martinez (11th Cir. 2021)
- United States v. Wooden (11th Cir. 1999)
- United States v. Wooden (11th Cir. 1999)
- United States v. Murray (4th Cir. 1999)
- United States v. Bourne (11th Cir. 1997)
- United States v. Jermeka Voya Hawkins (5th Cir. 1996)
- United States v. Wilda M. Thomas Elizabeth W. Thomas (11th Cir. 1995)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Upon consideration of the Appellee’s petition for rehearing in the nature of a request for modification, that petition is granted, and the opinion filed in this case on March 23, 1994, and published at 16 F.3d 1168, is modified in one respect. The overlapping paragraph on 16 F.3d at 1171-72, and the two footnotes accompanying it, are deleted, and in their place the following paragraph is substituted:
Considering the elements of the offense of bank robbery and the specific offense characteristics of § 2B3.1, we conclude that the fact that the crime in this case involves four bank robbers, and the fact that three of the robbers were armed and went into the bank, one with an Uzi machine pistol, are aggravating factors present to a degree not adequately considered by the Sentencing Commission in formulating the guidelines. In other words, these particular facts take this case outside the heartland of bank robberies and justify an upward departure. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(b).
Judge HILL adheres to his dissent. 16 F.3d at 1172-73.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.