Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1994

David E. Elliott, Jr., an Incapacitated Adult by and Through His Guardian, Barbara v. Elliott, Barbara v. Elliott, Individually v. United States

David E. Elliott, Jr., an Incapacitated Adult by and Through His Guardian, Barbara v. Elliott, Barbara v. Elliott, Individually v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 28, 1994 · Tjoflat, Kravitch, Hatchett, Anderson, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes, Barkett
28 F.3d 1076; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 21600; 1994 WL 390145 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

H. Randolph Aderhold, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Macon, GA, Vicki Raines Crowell, Department of the Army, Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, Fort Benning, GA, Lowell Y. Sturgill, Jr., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Robert S. Greenspan, Washington, DC, for appellant., Paul Van Kilpatrick, Max Reginald McGlamry, Charles Neal Pope, Columbus, GA, Wade H. Tomlinson, III, Pope, McGlam-ry, Kilpatrick & Morrison, Michael L. McGlamry, Steven W. Saccoecia, Atlanta, GA, for appellee.

David E. Elliott, Jr., an Incapacitated Adult by and Through His Guardian, Barbara v. Elliott, Barbara v. Elliott, Individually v. United States

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION OF REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion February 15, 1994, 11th Cir., 1994, 13 F.3d 1555)

July 28, 1994.

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. * BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en bane,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.