Malot v. Roy F. Weston, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- David Cockrell, Jr. v. Department of Veterans Affairs (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Whirllie M. Byrd v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Leo J. Oros and Leo E. Oros, and Environmental Process Equipment, Inc. v. Enviroquip, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Drako I. El-Amin v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Russo Bailey v. Mark Gilberg (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Helen J. Lipscomb v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Nucleus Corporation v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of the Army (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Gladys W. Smith v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Robert W. Kearns v. Toyota, Nissan, Honda, Toyo Kogyo (Mazda), and Fuji (Subaru), Defendants/cross-Appellants (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Paul R. Gimbel, Claimant-Appellee v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Robert L. Carter v. Department of the Army (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Robert W. Kearns v. Arnold, White & Durkee Corp., and American Arbitration Association (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Victor A. Coffey v. United States Postal Service (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- Louis A. Rousselle v. Merit Systems Protection Board (Fed. Cir. 1994)
- In re Edward Zager and Gregory Mathews (Fed. Cir. 1994)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
39 F.3d 1194
NOTICE: Eleventh Circuit Rule 36-2 states that unpublished opinions are not considered binding precedent. They may be cited as persuasive authority, provided that a copy of the unpublished opinion is attached to or incorporated within the brief, petition or motion.
James J. MALOT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ROY F. WESTON, INC. and Weston Services, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-1446.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Sept. 19, 1994.
N.D.Ga.
APPEAL DEACTIVATED.
ORDER
On consideration of the notice of appeal, a motion of the type enumerated in Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4) having been filed in the United States District Court/NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA rendering the notice of appeal ineffective, it is
ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, DEACTIVATED.
The appeal will be REACTIVATED upon entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.