U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1994

Nipper v. Smith

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 10, 1994 · Anderson, Birch, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Hatchett, Kravitch, Tjoflat

17 F.3d 1352; 1994 WL 81683 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Brenda Wright, Washington DC, Robert B. McDuff, Jackson, MS, Denise M. Prescod, Jacksonville, FL, Mitchell F. Dolin, Washington, DC, Sherrilyn A Ml, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants., George L. Wass, Harry F. Chiles, Denis Dean, Dept, of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, FL, Frank E. Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard S. Magid, Jacksonville, FL, Mitchell D. Franks, Lakeland, FL, for defendants-appel-lees., Rebecca K. Troth, Dept, of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Appellate Section, Washington, DC, Howard C. Coker, Coker, Myers, Schickel, Cooper & Sorenson' Jacksonville, FL, for U.S.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Nipper v. Smith (11th Cir. 1994)
Nipper v. Smith (11th Cir. 1994)
Southern Christian Leadership Conference Of Alabama v. Sessions (3d Cir. 1995)
Southern Christian Leadership Conference v. Sessions (11th Cir. 1995)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

070rehearing

PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion September 15, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993, 1 F.3d 1171)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.