Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit April 12, 1994

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp., 20 F.3d 397 (11th Cir. 1994)

1994 WL 123763

Anderson, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Hatchett, Kravitch, Tjoflat

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en bane. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Reference

Full Case Name: RESOLUTION TRUST CORP. v. DUNMAR CORP. and Michael D. Jones, Defendants-Counterclaim The First F.A., Defendant-Counterclaim Sherman Dantzler and Jack Shirek, and The First F.A. of Orlando and Resolution Trust Corp., Counter-Defendants Michael D. JONES Robert S. Guskiewicz R.S. Futch, Jr. v. RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Defendant-Third Party v. Philip DONLEVY William Crawford Robert Stone v. SEMINOLE FLYING AND SOARING, INC., and The First F.A. of Orlando, Third Party Defendants RESOLUTION TRUST CORP., Plaintiff-Counter v. LAKE PICKETT, LTD., a Florida Limited Partnership Michael D. Jones, as general partner, d/b/a Lake Pickett, Ltd., a Florida Limited Partnership Michael D. Jones, individually and as Trustee, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs-Appellants, The First F.A. of Orlando
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published