U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1994

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 12, 1994 · Anderson, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Hatchett, Kravitch, Tjoflat
20 F.3d 397; 1994 WL 123763 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Broad and Cassel, Brenda Lee London, Robert D. Gatton, Orlando, FL, for appellants., Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, P.A., Orlando, FL, E. Givens Goodspeed, Kirk K. Van Tine, Baker & Botts, Washington, DC, for appel-lees.

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en bane. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.