U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1994

Elliott ex rel. Elliott v. United States

Elliott ex rel. Elliott v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided November 8, 1994 · Anderson, Barkett, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Kravitch, Tjoflat
37 F.3d 617; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 31508 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Elliott ex rel. Elliott v. United States

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Prior Report: 13 F.3d 1555

The judges of the en banc court are equally divided on the proper disposition of this case. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED by operation of law. See, e.g., Smith v. Zant, 887 F.2d 1407, 1408 (11th Cir. 1989); Reshard v. Britt, 839 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.