U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1994

Elliott ex rel. Elliott v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided November 8, 1994 · Anderson, Barkett, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Fay, Hatchett, Kravitch, Tjoflat

37 F.3d 617; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 31508 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

H. Randolph Aderhold, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Macon, GA Vicki Raines Crowell, Dept, of the Army, Office of the Staff Judge Advocate, Fort Benning, GA Lowell V. Stur-gill, Jr., Robert S. Greenspan, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for appellant., Paul Van Kilpatrick, Max Reginald McGlamry, Charles Neal Pope, Columbus, GA, Wade H. Tomlinson, III, Michael L. McGlamry, Steven W. Saccoecia, Pope, McGlamry, Kilpatrick & Morrison, Atlanta, GA, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Lanus Ex Rel. Estate of Lanus v. United States (11th Cir. 2012)
David E. Elliott, Jr., an Incapacitated Adult by and Through His Guardian, Barbara v. Elliott, Barbara v. Elliott, Individually v. United States (11th Cir. 1994)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Prior Report: 13 F.3d 1555

The judges of the en banc court are equally divided on the proper disposition of this case. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED by operation of law. See, e.g., Smith v. Zant, 887 F.2d 1407, 1408 (11th Cir. 1989); Reshard v. Britt, 839 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.