U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1994

Cheffer v. McGregor

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided December 14, 1994 · Anderson, Barkett, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Hatchett, Kravitch, Tjoflat

41 F.3d 1421; 1994 WL 698491 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Mathew D. Staver, Jeffrey T. Kipi, Orlando, FL, for appellant., Gerald B. Curington, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept, of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, FL,, James L. Remman, Melbourne, FL, Jennifer Parker LaVia, Gayle Smith Swedmark, Tallahassee, FL, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

McKusick v. City of Melbourne, FL (11th Cir. 1996)
Cheffer v. McGregor (11th Cir. 1994)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court sitting en banc. The previous panel opinion, 6 F.3d 705 (11th Cir. 1993), is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.