U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1994

Resolution Trust Corp. v. Town of Highland Beach

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided December 29, 1994 · Anderson, Barkett, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Hatchett, Kravitch, Tjoflat

42 F.3d 626; 1994 WL 721770 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Patrice A. Talisman, Sam Daniels, Paul, Landy, Beiley & Harper, P.A., Miami, FL, George P. Roberts, Jr., George R. Roberts, Sr., Roberts & Reynolds, West Palm Beach, FL, for appellant., John C. Dotterrer, Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, Palm Beach, FL, Margaret L. Cooper, Jones, Foster, Johnston & Stubbs, P.A., West Palm Beach, FL, for ap-pellees in both cases., Randee S. Schatz, Palm Beach, FL, for appellees in No. 92-4462., Michael J. Kennedy, Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts, Palm Beach, FL, for appellees in No. 92-5097., Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Nos. 87-8483-CIV-WJZ (JM), 87-8483-CIV-WJZ), Jacob Mishler, Judge, Sitting by Designation and William J. Zloch, Judge.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.

New Port Largo, Inc. v. Monroe County (11th Cir. 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 19, 1994, 11th Cir., 1994, 18 F.3d 1536).

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en bane and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.