U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1995

United States v. Fredel Williamson, A/K/A "Fred"

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided March 16, 1995 · Tjoflat, Hatchett, Anderson

47 F.3d 1090; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 5495; 1995 WL 81980 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Benjamin S. Waxman, Frederick S. Robbins, Weiner, Robbins, Tunkey & Ross, P.A., Miami, FL, for appellant., Deborah A. Griffin, Asst. U.S. Atty., Mike Solis, Charles Cox, Macon, GA, David S. Kris, U.S. Dept, of Justice, Crim. Div., Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for appel-lee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (5th Cir. 2014)
United States v. McVeigh (United States District Court for the District of Colorado 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, HATCHETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

In its opinion published as Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 2431, 129 L.Ed.2d 476 (1994), the United States *1091 Supreme Court vacated this court’s judgment and remanded the ease for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.

Further proceedings in this case will involve issues relating to the government’s ability or desire to continue this prosecution, issues that can be better resolved in the district court.

Accordingly, this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Court’s opinion.

REMANDED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.