U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1995

George R. Bender v. Centrust Mortgage Corporation, a California Corporation, Resolution Trust Corporation, Conservator/receiver for Centrust Bank

George R. Bender v. Centrust Mortgage Corporation, a California Corporation, Resolution Trust Corporation, Conservator/receiver for Centrust Bank
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 11, 1995 · Carnes, Dyer, Guy, Per Curiam
60 F.3d 1507; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 21683; 1995 WL 443889 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Hinda Klein, Conroy Simberg and Lewis, P.A., Hollywood, FL, Timothy D. Naegele, Washington, DC, for appellant., Kirk K. Van Tine, Wendy J. Lang, Kim-berlee Ann Sealia, Baker & Botts, L.L.P., Washington, DC, Marcia Soto Conner, Alan J. Kluger, Kluger, Peretz, Kaplan & Berlin, P.A., P. Matthew Sutko, Resolution Trust Corp., Washington, DC, for appellees.

George R. Bender v. Centrust Mortgage Corporation, a California Corporation, Resolution Trust Corporation, Conservator/receiver for Centrust Bank

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On Appellant Bender’s Petition for Rehearing, we modify the opinion in this case by deleting the last sentence in the first paragraph on page 1973 which reads:

Count XI fails to allege the basic elements necessary for a constructive trust: specific property as the res, and fraud by the defendant in obtaining plaintiffs property.

In all other respects the Petition for Rehearing is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.