Harrell v. Decatur County, GA
Cases that cite this one
11 later published cases cite this decision.
- Hill v. City of Montgomery, Alabama (NO DISCOVERY DOC 228) (CONSENT) (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 2022)
- Mildred Robinson v. Daniel Arrugueta (11th Cir. 2005)
- Arrid Baltimore v. City of Albany, Georgia (11th Cir. 2006)
- Pablo Hernandez v. City of Miami (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 2004)
- Willingham v. Loughnan (11th Cir. 2001)
- Sims Ex Rel. Sims v. Forehand (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 2000)
- Medeiros v. Town of Dracut (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1998)
- Montoute v. City of Sebring (11th Cir. 1997)
- Morello v. Russell (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
- Sweatt v. Bailey (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 1995)
- McGory v. Metcalf (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
41 F.3d 1494
Linda L. HARRELL, Individually, as Personal Representative,
and as Surviving Spouse of Larry Gene Harrell,
Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DECATUR COUNTY, GA., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 93-8905, 93-9165.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
Jan. 10, 1995.
Nick M. Bajalia, Valdosta, GA, Charles A. Mathis, Jr., D. James Jordan, Milledgeville, GA, for appellant.
George M. Peagler, Jr., Ellis & Easterlin, Americus, GA, William C. Sanders, Alexander & Vann, Thomasville, GA, for appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia (No. 91-59-THOM), J. Robert Elliott, District Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before HATCHETT and DUBINA, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH*, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Our previous panel opinion reported at 22 F.3d 1570 (11th Cir. 1994) is hereby VACATED.1
After rehearing this case, which included the consideration of supplemental briefs and additional oral argument, we now affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment in all respects. We affirm for the reasons set forth in Judge Dubina's dissenting opinion in Harrell, 22 F.3d at 1577-81, and this court's recent decision in Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, 28 F.3d 1146 (1994) (en banc), which the panel did not have the benefit of at the time we released our opinion in Harrell.
AFFIRMED.
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge, concurring:
I agree with this court's decision to affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment on the question of qualified immunity for Deputy Morris in his individual capacity for the reasons set forth in Judge Dubina's dissenting opinion in Harrell, 22 F.3d at 1577-80 and this court's recent decision in Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, 28 F.3d 1146 (11th Cir. 1994) (en banc). I write separately to emphasize that we affirm the district court's grant of summary judgment with respect to the claims against Deputy Morris in his official capacity, Sheriff Phillips in his individual and official capacities, Decatur County, and the Decatur County Commissioners because of our determination that Harrell was not deprived of any constitutional rights for the reasons set forth in Judge Dubina's dissenting opinion in Harrell, 22 F.3d at 1580-81.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.