U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1995

Warren Publishing, Inc.-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Microdos Data Corp. Robert Payne-Counter-Claimants-Appellants

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided October 5, 1995 · Tjoflat, Kravitch, Hatchett, Anderson, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes, Barkett

67 F.3d 276; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27890; 1995 WL 584714 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Carl M. Davis, II, Kennedy & Kennedy, Atlanta, GA, for appellants., Joyce B. Klemmer, Smith Gambrell & Russell, Atlanta, GA, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Warren Publishing, Inc., Counter-Defendant v. Microdos Data Corp. Robert Payne, Counter-Claimants (11th Cir. 1997)
Warren Publishing v. Microdos Data (11th Cir. 1995)
Warren Publishing v. Microdos Data (11th Cir. 1995)
Skinder-Strauss Associates v. Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc. (District Court, D. Massachusetts 1995)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*277 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. * BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.