Pottinger v. City of Miami

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Pottinger v. City of Miami, 76 F.3d 1154 (11th Cir. 1996)
1996 WL 47942

Pottinger v. City of Miami

Opinion of the Court

INTERIM ORDER:

The panel heard oral argument in this case on January 24, 1996. After hearing oral argument, the panel is of the opinion that this case can be and should be settled.

The panel hereby refers this appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Conference Attorney for settlement discussions, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 33 and Eleventh Circuit Rule 33-1.

The parties and their counsel are directed to contact this court’s Appellate Conference Office not later than fifteen days from receipt of this order to explore a resolution of their differences.

Before settlement discussions, counsel for the parties must consult with their clients and obtain as much authority as feasible to settle the appeal. Counsel and the parties are expected to discuss all issues in good faith.

The conference attorney shall issue an order as contemplated by Eleventh Circuit Rule 33 — 1(d) or issue a report to the panel not later than April 15,1996.

Reference

Full Case Name
Michael POTTINGER, Peter Carter, Berry Young v. CITY OF MIAMI
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published