U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1996

Pottinger v. City of Miami

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 7, 1996 · Anderson, Fay, Hatchett

76 F.3d 1154; 1996 WL 47942 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

A. Quinn Jones, City Atty., Leon M. Firtel, Asst. City Atty., Kathryn S. Pecko, Theresa L. Girten, Miami, FL, for appellant., Kraig A. Conn, Nancy Ann M. Stuparich, Harry Morrison, Jr., Tallahassee, FL, for amicus curiae Fla. League of Cities., Thomas K. Braun, Becky S. James, Frieda A. Taylor, O’Melveny & Myers, Los Angeles, CA, for amicus curiae Nat’l Coalition for the Homeless., Benjamin S. Waxman, ACLU of Florida, Miami, FL, Jeffrey S. Weiner, Miami, FL, Stephen J. Schnably, University of Miami Law School, Coral Gables, FL, for appellees., Maria Foscarinis, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty., William T. O’Neil, Covington & Burling, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

David Peery v. City of Miami (11th Cir. 2015)
Michael Pottinger, Peter Carter, Berry Young v. City of Miami (11th Cir. 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

INTERIM ORDER:

The panel heard oral argument in this case on January 24, 1996. After hearing oral argument, the panel is of the opinion that this case can be and should be settled.

The panel hereby refers this appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Conference Attorney for settlement discussions, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 33 and Eleventh Circuit Rule 33-1.

The parties and their counsel are directed to contact this court’s Appellate Conference Office not later than fifteen days from receipt of this order to explore a resolution of their differences.

Before settlement discussions, counsel for the parties must consult with their clients and obtain as much authority as feasible to settle the appeal. Counsel and the parties are expected to discuss all issues in good faith.

The conference attorney shall issue an order as contemplated by Eleventh Circuit Rule 33 — 1(d) or issue a report to the panel not later than April 15,1996.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.