U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1996

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 13, 1996 · Anderson, Barkett, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Hatchett, Kravitch, Tjoflat
83 F.3d 1346; 1996 WL 244622 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

William R. Amlong, Amlong & Amlong, PA, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for appellants., Cathy M. Stutin, Peter J. Hurtgen, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Miami, FL, for City of Boca Raton., Michael T. Burke, Christine M. Duignan, Johnson, Anselmo, Murdoch, Burke & George, PA., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Bill Terry.

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en bane,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.