U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1996

United States v. Hofierka

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 28, 1996 · Anderson, Hatchett, Tjoflat

92 F.3d 1108; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 22057; 1996 WL 455506 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

James H. Burke, Jr., Asst. Federal Public Defender, William Mallory Kent, Jacksonville, Florida, for Appellant in No. 95-2258., Thomas Morris, Charles L. Trúncale, Asst. U.S. Attys., Jacksonville, Florida, Tamra Phipps, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tampa, Florida, for Appellee in No. 95-2258., William M. Kent, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Jacksonville, FL, for Appellant in No. 95-2151., Richard Poole, Asst. U.S. Atty., James R. Klindt, Peggy M. Ronca, Jacksonville, FL, Tamra Phipps, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tampa, FL, for Appellee in No. 95-2151.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Telemaque (11th Cir. 2016)
United States v. Charles Dana Combs, II (11th Cir. 2013)
United States v. Shannon Shaw (8th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Debbie H. George (9th Cir. 1999)
United States v. George A. Pelensky (2d Cir. 1997)
Slugocki v. US BY AND THROUGH DEPT. OF LABOR (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1997)
Slugocki v. United States ex rel. Department of Labor, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Division of Federal Employees' Compensation (United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 1997)
United States v. Pettiford (1st Cir. 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, and HATCHETT and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Upon consideration of the appellants’ petition for panel rehearing, the same is granted; and the opinion filed in this case on May 16, 1996, and published at 83 F.3d 357, is modified in one respect. Footnote 7 of the opinion is deleted.

In all other respects, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.