U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1996

United States v. Charles Phillip Elliott, William Melhorn

United States v. Charles Phillip Elliott, William Melhorn
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided April 24, 1996 · Anderson, Birch, Johnson, Per Curiam
82 F.3d 989; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 42574; 1996 WL 196103 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Charles Phillip Elliott, William Melhorn

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The opinion published at 62 F.3d 1304 (11th Cir. 1995) is amended with respect to section IIC1 as follows:

(1) on page 1313, the twelfth line of the first paragraph under section IIC1, located on the right side of the page, “named” is deleted and is replaced with “identified”;
(2) on page 1314, the nineteenth line of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, “named” is deleted and is replaced with “identified”;
(3) on page 1314, the twentieth line of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, following “indictment” and preceding the period and footnote number, add “because their losses have been proved and are the direct result of Elliott and Melhom’s crimes of conviction”;
(4) on page 1314, the twenty-first line of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, following “court’s,” add “restitution”; and
(5) on page 1314, the twenty-third through the twenty-fourth lines of the first full paragraph, located on the left side of the page, delete “not named in the Amended Indictment” and replace with “whose losses are unsubstantiated and are too attenuated from the crimes of conviction.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.