United States v. Raymond Joseph Denalli

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit August 1, 1996

United States v. Raymond Joseph Denalli, 90 F.3d 444 (11th Cir. 1996)

1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18870; 1996 WL 400001

Hatchett, Birch, Godbold

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before HATCHETT and BIRCH, Circuit Judges, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge. PER CURIAM:

The petition for rehearing filed by the United States is GRANTED to the following extent:

The first full paragraph in the right hand column of 73 F.3d 328 is deleted and replaced by the following:

We easily conclude that the Federles’ private residence was not used in interstate or foreign commerce; therefore, this court must determine only if the residence was used in any activity affecting interstate or foreign commerce.

The first sentence of the paragraph on 73 F.3d at 330 labeled as [2] is deleted and replaced by the following:

[2] Lopez required the government to prove that Federles’ private residence was used in an activity that had a substantial effect on interstate commerce.

In all other respects the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

Reference

Full Case Name: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Joseph DENALLI, Defendant-Appellant
Cited By: 14 cases
Status: Published