U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1997

Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp.

Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided February 18, 1997
107 F.3d 830; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3577 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Armstrong v. Martin Marietta Corp.

Opinion

107 F.3d 830

10 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 757

David M. ARMSTRONG, L. Benson Barger, Wallace D. Black,
Howard Brooks, Jerry A. Budd, Sonja M. Carter, Dominick C.
Cizek, Carol D. Clark-Iley, Charles H. Davis, Kenneth O.
Giessuebel, Herold P. Glaser, Robert A. Havlish, Kumar
Hinduja, Joseph C. Jett, Glenn E. Johnson, Robert C. Lerche,
Calvin N. Lightner, George W. McGuirk, James W. McLean,
William G. Murphy, Donald L. Prasky, Clark C. Rains, Myrtle
Y. Redding, Kenneth A. Richards, Russell G. Roberts, Linda
L. Ryan, Victor W. Shaw, Linton W. Smith, Michael Sylvestri,
Marlon K. Tarter, Delbert S. Turner, Edward W. Walsh, Joseph
W. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Constantino A. Barbitta, James R. Baxter, Robert D. Biggs,
James H. Black, Rick L. Bordner, Rodmond M. Cookson, David
B. Pool, Roger A. Purcell, Rama S. Singh, Charles M. Smith,
Robert G. Swanson, William F. Waldrop, Kenneth E. Welch, Plaintiffs,
v.
MARTIN MARIETTA CORP., Martin Marietta Technologies, Inc.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-3255.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Feb. 18, 1997.

Norman B. Smith, Smith, Follin & James, L.L.P., Greensboro, NC, Allen M. Blake, St. Petersburg, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Thomas C. Garwood, Jr. and Kay L. Wolf, Garwood, McKenna & McKenna, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (No. 94-1066-CV-ORL-18), G. Kendall Sharp, Judge.

Prior report: 93 F.3d 1505.

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the appellees' Suggestion of Hearing En Banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor thereof,IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be heard by this court sitting en banc.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.