Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1997

Gabe Kaimowitz, Esquire, Qui Tam, Usa, Ex Rel. v. Orlando, Florida, Rick Bernhardt, Orlando Neighborhood Improvement Corporation, ("Onic")

Gabe Kaimowitz, Esquire, Qui Tam, Usa, Ex Rel. v. Orlando, Florida, Rick Bernhardt, Orlando Neighborhood Improvement Corporation, ("Onic")
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided November 20, 1997 · Anderson, Black, Clark, Per Curiam
131 F.3d 950; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 41403; 1997 WL 767336 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)
Gabe Kaimowitz, Esquire, Qui Tam, Usa, Ex Rel. v. Orlando, Florida, Rick Bernhardt, Orlando Neighborhood Improvement Corporation, ("Onic")

Cases that cite this one

43 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

No member of this panel nor other judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the court be polled on Rehearing En Banc (Rule 35, Fed.R.App.P.; Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

On panel rehearing, the- last two sentences (including footnote 7) of the opinion are hereby deleted, and the following sentence is substituted in lieu thereof:

For the reason discussed above, the record conclusively established that Kairnowitz was not entitled in this suit to the unrelated preliminary injunction he sought, and thus it was clear that an evidentiary hearing was not necessary.

The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED in all respects except for the foregoing-amendment of the opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.