U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1998

Onishea v. Hopper

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided January 23, 1998 · Anderson, Barkett, Birch, Black, Carnes, Cox, Dubina, Edmondson, Hatchett, Hull, Marcus, Tjoflat

133 F.3d 1377; 1998 WL 27287 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Ayesha N. Khan, Margaret Winter, ACLU National Prison Project, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Elizabeth A. Seaton, Whitman-Walker, Washington, DC, -for amicus curiae., David Byrne, Jr., J. Elizabeth Kellum, Ro-bison & Belser, P.A., Montgomery, AL, Alice Ann Byrne, Dept, of Correction/Legal Div., Montgomery, AL, for Defendants-Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Onishea v. Hopper (11th Cir. 1999)
Onishea v. Hopper (11th Cir. 1998)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 4, 1997, 11th Cir., 126 F.3d 1323).

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges.* BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en bane and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.