Lancaster v. Monroe County
Lancaster v. Monroe County
Opinion
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 96-6735
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 95-0531-CB-C CYLINDA H. LANCASTER, as the administratrix of the estate of Harold B. Lancaster,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus MONROE COUNTY, ALABAMA, Sheriff Thomas Tate; Monroe County Commission; Robert Rankins; Eddie Wells; and Ann Jackson,
Defendants-Appellees.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
_________________________
(March 20, 1998) Before BIRCH and CARNES, Circuit Judges and PROPST*, Senior District Judge.
*
Honorable Robert B. Propst, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of Alabama, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM:
Consistent with our prior opinion in this case, see Lancaster v. Monroe County, Alabama, 116 F.3d 1419, 1428-29 & n.11 (11th Cir. 1997), after our issuance of that opinion, the parties moved for a stay of the mandate pending the results of mediation. We stayed the mandate, and have now been informed that the parties have worked out a settlement of the entire case, which they wish to effectuate in the district court.
Accordingly, we remand the entire case to the district court for that purpose. Our mandate will issue forthwith and the parties may file the necessary papers in the district court to effectuate their settlement.
2
Reference
- Status
- Published