Richardson v. INS

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Richardson v. INS, 162 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 1998)

Richardson v. INS

Opinion

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 98-4230 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ 05/04/99 THOMAS K. KAHN D. C. Docket No. 97-3799-CIV-DAVIS CLERK

RALPH RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States; DORIS MEISSNER, Commission, Immigration and Naturalization Service; ROBERT WALLIS, Acting District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service; UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; and EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION REVIEW, Defendants-Appellants. ________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _________________________ (May 4, 1999)

Before CARNES and HULL, Circuit Judges, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

BY THE COURT:

The United States Supreme Court narrowly has restricted the circumstances in which a

court of appeals can recall a mandate in a case. Calderon v. Thompson, 118 S. Ct. 1489, 1498

(1998). In view of what the Supreme Court instructs in Calderon, we deny the Petitioner Richardson’s “Application to Withdraw this Court’s Mandate and Stay or Summarily Reverse its

Decision in light of Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, et al.”

Since Richardson has filed a petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court, we would

welcome, however, an opportunity to revisit our decision in Richardson v. Reno, 162 F.3d 1338

(1998), in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination

Committee, 119 S. Ct. 936 (1999) (“AADC”), if the Supreme Court should vacate our decision

and remand for further proceedings in this case, which would automatically recall the mandate.

Unless and until that happens, this Court lacks the authority to decide whether INA § 1252(b)(9)

precludes jurisdiction, independently of INA § 1252(g), or any other issues arising in the wake

of the AADC decision. 8 U.S.C. §§ 1252(b)(9) and 1252(g). See American-Arab, 119 S. Ct. at 943; Richardson, 162 F.3d at 1345-46, 1354, 1358 n.99, 1373-74, 1377.

-2-

Reference

Status
Published