United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De Varon
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- United States v. Isabel Rodriguez De Varon (11th Cir. 1999)
- United States v. De Varon (11th Cir. 1998)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
141 F.3d 1468
11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. C 1479
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Isabel RODRIGUEZ DE VARON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-5421.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
May 29, 1998.
Kathleen M. Williams, Fed. Pub. Defender, Faith Mesnekoff, Asst. Fed. Pub. Defender, Miami, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.
William A. Keefer, U.S. Atty., Dawn Bowen, Anne Ruth Schultz, Phillip DiRosa, Asst. U.S. Attys., Miami, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 96-576-CR-KMM), K. Michael Moore, Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion March 3, 1998, 11th Cir., 136 F.3d 740)
Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL and MARCUS, Circuit Judges*.
BY THE COURT:
A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Senior Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.