U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1998

United States v. Robert Jack Mills, Margie B. Mills

United States v. Robert Jack Mills, Margie B. Mills
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided September 1, 1998 · Hatchett, Edmondson, Cox
152 F.3d 1324; 50 Fed. R. Serv. 59; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 21843; 1998 WL 556264 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

United States v. Robert Jack Mills, Margie B. Mills

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The court sua sponte grants rehearing to make the following change to the opinion published at 138 F.3d 928.

The following text, published at 138 F.3d at 931-32, is deleted:

First American rounded out the scheme in 1991 meetings with Aetna auditors about documentation; there, Jack and First American’s counsel, Wayne Phears, denied knowing of “breaker flights” 5 and indeed berated Aetna for not trusting First American’s records.

The deleted text is replaced with the following:

In 1991 meetings with Aetna auditors about documentation, Jack and First American’s counsel, Wayne Phears, denied knowing of unreported flights 5 and indeed berated Aetna for not trusting First American’s records.

In all other respects the published opinion remains unchanged. The petitions of the United States, Margie Mills, and Jack Mills for panel rehearing are DENIED.

OPINION MODIFIED ON REHEARING; PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING DENIED.

5

One such flight to Cozumel the week before the meeting carried both Jack and Phears.

5

An unreported flight to Cozumel the week before the meeting carried both Jack and Phears.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.