U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1999

United States v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc., a Subsidiary of Precision Standard Company, a Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided July 6, 1999 · Anderson, Tjoflat, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes, Barkett, Hull, Marcus

179 F.3d 1327; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 15039; 1999 WL 458791 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

G. Douglas Jones, U.S. Atty., James G-Gann, III, Shirley I. McCarty, Asst. U.S. Attys., Birmingham, AL, Irene M. Solet, Douglas N. Letter, App. Staff, Civil Div., Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant., William F. Pendergast, G. Matthew Koehl, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc. (11th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc. (11th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Pemco Aeroplex, Inc., a Subsidiary of Precision Standard Company, a Corporation (11th Cir. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard, by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.