U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 1999

In re: Leroy Charles Griffith, Debtor. Leroy Charles Griffith v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided August 6, 1999 · Anderson, Tjoflat, Edmondson, Cox, Birch, Dubina, Black, Carnes, Barkett, Hull, Marcus

182 F.3d 1297; 84 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5721; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18403; 1999 WL 594949 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Robert L. Roth, Attorney at Law, Coral Gables, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Laurie Snyder, Tax Division, Department of Justice, Bruce R. Ellisen, Dept, of Justice, Appellate Tax Division, John A. Dudeck, Jr., Department of Justice, Appellate Section, Washington, DC, for Défen-dant-Appellee., William A. Keefer, Miami, FL,-for Defendant-Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Feshbach v. United States Department of Treasury (In re Feshbach) (United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida 2017)
In re: Leroy Charles Griffith, Debtor. Leroy Charles Griffith v. United States (11th Cir. 2000)
United States v. Carnes (In re Carnes) (United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri 2000)
Griffith v. United States (11th Cir. 1999)
Griffith v. United States (11th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Fretz (United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama 2000)
Pert v. United States (In re Pert) (United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida 2000)
Johnson v. United States (In re Johnson) (United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas 2000)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.