U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2001

Daniel Welzel v. Advocate Realty Investments

Daniel Welzel v. Advocate Realty Investments
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided June 29, 2001
255 F.3d 1266 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Daniel Welzel v. Advocate Realty Investments

Opinion

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ____________________________ No. 99-14875 ____________________________ D.C. Docket No. 99-00142-CV-4

DANIEL A. WELZEL, Debtor. --------------------------------------------------- ADVOCATE REALTY INVESTMENTS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, KENNETH L. ROYAL, Plaintiff, versus DANIEL A. WELZEL, Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________ No. 99-14876 ______________________________ D. C. Docket No. 99-00145-CV-4 DANIEL A. WELZEL, Debtor. ------------------------------------------------ ADVOCATE REALTY INVESTMENTS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, KENNETH L. ROYAL, Plaintiff, versus DANIEL A. WELZEL, Defendant-Appellee.

------------------------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia ------------------------------------- (Opinion June 29, 2001, 245 F.3d 1283, 11th Cir., 2001) (August 7, 2001)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT: A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc.

The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

*Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Emmett R. Cox has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.