In AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 223 F.3d 1324 (11th Cir. 2000) {“AT&T Wireless II”), we vacated our earlier opinion, AT&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. City of Atlanta, 210 F.3d 1322 (11th Cir. 2000) {“AT&T Wireless I”), and dismissed the appeal because we lacked jurisdiction over an appeal from a non-final judgment. See AT&T Wireless II, 223 F.3d at 1324. The parties to that appeal have since returned to district court, where the district court entered a final judgment in the case. They presently appeal the final judgment, submitting for our consideration the same issue we examined in AT&T Wireless I. 1 We now have jurisdiction over their appeal, and upon reconsideration, we re-instate our AT&T Wireless I opinion, published at 210 F.3d 1322. Prior opinion in appeal No. 99-12261 REINSTATED.

VACATED and REMANDED.