[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ____________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT APRIL 1, 2003 THOMAS K. KAHN No. 02-12054 CLERK ____________________________ D. C. Docket No. 97-01935-CV-UUB

AURELIO O. GONZALEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, versus SECRETARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, James Crosby, Secretary, Respondent-Appellee.

______________________________ No. 02-12483 ______________________________ D. C. Docket Nos. 96-08752-CV-WJZ and 90-08108 CR-WJZ EMIL LAZO, Petitioner-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. ---------------------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida --------------------------------- _____________________________ No. 02-14224 _____________________________ D. C. Docket No. 99-00023-CV STEPHEN A. MOBLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, versus FREDERICK HEAD, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellee.

---------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ---------------------------------- (April 1, 2003) Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

B Y T H E C O U R T: The Court has determined to hear the following cases en banc: Mobley v.

Head, No. 02-14224, Lazo v. U.S., No. 02-12483, and Gonzalez v. Sec’y for the Dept. of Corrections, No. 02-12054.

The cases will be orally argued before the Court sitting en banc on June 17, 2003, in Atlanta, Georgia.

The Court sua sponte VACATES the following orders: the December 16, 2002, Order issued in Lazo v. U.S., No. 02-12483, as well as the January 10, 2003 and the August 15, 2002, Orders issued in Gonzalez v. Sec’y for the Dept. of Corrections, No. 02-12054.

Nos. 02-12483 and 02-12054 are hereby REINSTATED.

Counsel for Appellants Lazo and Gonzalez will be appointed by separate Order.

In light of the above, Appellant Gonzalez’ “Motion to Reconsider, Vacate or Modify” is DENIED AS MOOT.