United States v. David Henson McNab, Robert D. Blanford

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. David Henson McNab, Robert D. Blanford

Opinion

[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS __________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 29, 2003 No. 01-15148 THOMAS K. KAHN __________________________ CLERK

D. C. Docket No. 00-00079-CR-1-RV

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID HENSON MCNAB, ROBERT D. BLANDFORD, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

___________________________

No. 02-10810 ___________________________

D. C. Docket No. 00-00079-CR-CB

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ABNER SCHOENWETTER, ROBERT D. BLANDFORD, Defendants-Appellants. _____________________________

No. 02-11264 _____________________________

D. C. Docket No. 00-00079-CR-1-RV

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID HENSON MCNAB, ABNER SCHOENWETTER, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _________________________ (May 29, 2003)

Before HULL, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.

ORDERED:

The petitions for rehearing are granted in part by deleting entirely footnote

24 from the Court’s opinion which was issued on March 21, 2003. The Court will

issue a substituted opinion making that deletion. The Court otherwise denies the

petitions for rehearing of defendants’ McNabb, Schoenwetter, Huang, Blandford

and Embassy of Honduras.

2 No member of this Court having requested a poll, we deny the suggestion

for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(a); Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5.

FAY, Circuit Judge, dissents.

3

Reference

Status
Published