U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, 2003

United States v. David Henson McNab, Robert D. Blanford

United States v. David Henson McNab, Robert D. Blanford
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Decided May 29, 2003

United States v. David Henson McNab, Robert D. Blanford

Opinion

[PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS __________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT MAY 29, 2003 No. 01-15148 THOMAS K. KAHN __________________________ CLERK D. C. Docket No. 00-00079-CR-1-RV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID HENSON MCNAB, ROBERT D. BLANDFORD, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

___________________________ No. 02-10810 ___________________________ D. C. Docket No. 00-00079-CR-CB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ABNER SCHOENWETTER, ROBERT D. BLANDFORD, Defendants-Appellants. _____________________________ No. 02-11264 _____________________________ D. C. Docket No. 00-00079-CR-1-RV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID HENSON MCNAB, ABNER SCHOENWETTER, et al., Defendants-Appellants.

________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _________________________ (May 29, 2003)

Before HULL, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.

ORDERED: The petitions for rehearing are granted in part by deleting entirely footnote from the Court’s opinion which was issued on March 21, 2003. The Court will issue a substituted opinion making that deletion. The Court otherwise denies the petitions for rehearing of defendants’ McNabb, Schoenwetter, Huang, Blandford and Embassy of Honduras.

No member of this Court having requested a poll, we deny the suggestion for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 35(a); Eleventh Circuit Rule 35-5.

FAY, Circuit Judge, dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.