United States v. Charles Edward Musselman
United States v. Charles Edward Musselman
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FILED
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS
________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
December 16, 2005
No. 05-10819 THOMAS K. KAHN
Non-Argument Calendar CLERK
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 04-00032-CR-J-20MMH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus CHARLES EDWARD MUSSELMAN, a.k.a. Charlie,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(December 16, 2005) Before BLACK, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:
Ronald W. Maxwell, appointed counsel for Charles Edward Musselman in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Musselman’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished