United States v. Charles Edward Musselman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Charles Edward Musselman

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FILED

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUITU.S. COURT OF APPEALS

________________________ ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

December 16, 2005

No. 05-10819 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 04-00032-CR-J-20MMH UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CHARLES EDWARD MUSSELMAN, a.k.a. Charlie,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(December 16, 2005) Before BLACK, BARKETT and HILL, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM:

Ronald W. Maxwell, appointed counsel for Charles Edward Musselman in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Musselman’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished