United States v. David Lee Harris

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

United States v. David Lee Harris

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED

________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

December 8, 2005

No. 05-12108 THOMAS K. KAHN

Non-Argument Calendar CLERK

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-00052-CR-FTM-29-SPC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DAVID LEE HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(December 8, 2005) Before ANDERSON, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for David Lee Harris in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw, accompanied by a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and appellant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished