United States v. David Lee Harris
United States v. David Lee Harris
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED ________________________ U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT December 8, 2005 No. 05-12108 THOMAS K. KAHN Non-Argument Calendar CLERK ________________________ D. C. Docket No. 04-00052-CR-FTM-29-SPC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID LEE HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.
________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _________________________ (December 8, 2005)
Before ANDERSON, BLACK and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for David Lee Harris in this direct criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw, accompanied by a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and appellant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.